Friday, February 24, 2012

Stephen King and I

I promised at the end of my last post that I would write the next day. Obviously I got a bit sidetracked. It's been about ten days since my last post, but who's really counting?

Let me tell you a story -- a young seven-year-old boy, his hair a sandy blond shag that has not seen a pair of scissors in a few months, was walking through a Salvation Army with his mother on a late summer day. His mother told him to look through the books and pick one out while she perused the lightly worn clothing and furniture. The young boy is digging through the children's books, the heavy covers of Dr. Seuss bent with use, the cover of Sarah Boynton's Hippos Go Berserk! unfortunately torn so much that the boy tosses it aside with disgust. All the Berenstein Bears books he owned already and has read through them more times than he cares to count. Children's books are just becoming too boring for him.

He takes the opportunity to dig through the adult shelf, pulling down books with strange titles like The Mammoth Hunters, The Name of the Rose, . . . and the Ladies of the Club, and an entire shelf devoted to some lady named Danielle Steel. A book with a yellow jacket catches his eye. He pulls the musty smelling hardcover off the shelf and immediately the image on the jacket catches his attention. It's a picture of a dog's snarling muzzle, salvia dripping menacingly from its jowls. The title is a simple single word, which the young boy does not understand. Cujo.

The boy is intrigued. He opens the book up, skims the pages expecting to see pictures. All books have pictures, right? There has to be more pictures of the dog. What kind of dog is it? Why does it look mad on the jacket? What is a cujo?

But there are no pictures. Only black words typed on slightly yellowing pages, the first fifty or so slightly water damaged, as if someone had been reading it too close to the river and dropped it in the water for a split second before scrambling after it. The boy turns to the first page, and is immediately and unequivocally sucked in . . . Once Upon a Time (many of his books started like that -- this must be some sort of fairy tale book about a dog, he thinks). Not so long ago, a monster came to the small town of Castle Rock, Maine. He killed a waitress named . . . IT is a fairy tale!!!

The boy slammed the book shut, ran to his mother and announced, "I want this book." His mother gave it a cursory glance and asked, "It looks like a big book. Will you be able to read it?"

"Of course," the boy replied, "It's about a dog. See?" He pointed at the image on the jacket. His mother gave it another quick glance, did not say anything and handed him a couple of dollars. "Here you go. Give this to the lady at the register. Tell her you're buying the book."

That night the boy sat down in bed, and his life was forever changed.


As you've probably figured out, the little boy was me. I don't know what my mother was thinking. I very seriously doubt she had ever heard of Cujo, or Stephen King, which was why she let me buy that book. Although I no longer have a copy of that particular book, I found the image to the right online, and this is exactly what I showed her that day. Whether my hands were somehow covering the image, or she just glanced at it, I don't know. All I know is that Cujo was the first adult novel I ever read and I have been hooked on books ever since. This is the reason I have developed a soft spot in my heart for Stephen King. You never forget you're first. I cannot remember just how many of his books I have read. I am guessing that over the course of the past 24 years (of active adult reading), I think I have read nearly all of them.

When I (re-)started this blog, I began by reading Carrie, his first novel published in 1974. I then moved on to 'salem's Lot (1975) and finished that in short order. I figured what the hell, why not read another one, and since I am reading them in order, I picked up a copy of The Shining (1977). I finished The Shining less than two hours ago, and needless to say I am a little creeped out. It's one book I had never read. I remember watching the Stanley Kubrick movie (Herrrrrrrreee's Johnny!) when I was somewhere around ten or eleven years old. As creepy as Jack Nicholson was in that film, it was the twin girls and the blood pouring out of the elevator that had scared me the most. For those reasons, I was hesitant to ever pick up the book.

I guess I was lucky enough to attend a pretty progressive high school. In the school library, nearly everyone of Stephen King's novels was available to check out. All through high school, instead of reading The Grapes of Wrath or Romeo and Juliet, or whatever great work of literature that I was supposed to read, I was checking out Stephen King books and reading them, as well as historical fiction novels like John Jakes' Kent Family Chronicles. The funny thing is, I earned my Bachelor's of Art in Literature, and a second Bachelor's in History. If you were to look at my high school grades, I consistently earned C's and D's in History and English. I was in my own world, reading what interested me, and ignored what the school felt I needed to learn. I did the bare minium to get by.

The Shining stood on the shelf of the school library, untouched by me because of some fear of creepy kids and bloody elevators and redrum. It was not until I was a 31 year old adult that I was able to tackle the book. As usual, the book is always better than the movie. Without giving too much away to those of you who have not read it, the book does not feature creepy twin girls, it does not have an elevator full of blood, and the novel is centered around a five-year-old boy, not his father as in the movie.

The book did not disappoint in the least. I loved it and regret not reading it earlier in life. For those of you that have watched the Stanley Kubrick movie, and loved it (despite what I believe was the miscasting of Shelley Duvall), I suggest strongly that you read the book. The story in the movie is so different from the story in the book that even if you think you know what is coming, you will more than likely be wrong.

I was thinking that I would change the focus of this blog, call it My Year with Stephen King, and logically the next story in the progression of Stephen King's career is a title he published in 1977 called Rage. Never heard of it, you may say. It would not be a surprise. He published it under his pseudonym Richard Bachmann, and he has since requested that it be taken out of print. It is Stephen King's only piece of written fiction that is out of print.

I will take a break from Stephen King, for now, while I track down this elusive story. I am switching gears, to a non-fiction yarn called A Crack in the Edge of the World. Written by Simon Winchester, at it's center is the devastation of the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, with a good bit of tectonics thrown in for good measure.

So until next time, Thank You, and Good Night

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

It's Been a Few Weeks

Sorry, it's been a few weeks since last I was able to post. I was sick -- if it was not one thing, it was another. So what have I been up to since last we spoke? Genealogy and Stephen King.

About a year ago, I was tooling around on the internet, and remembered Ancestry.com. I was a member quite a few years ago, but lost interest for awhile in the whole genealogy thing. I ran into some dead ends and tripped over a few false leads. I continued to receive emails from them, those spammy type emails begging you to sign back up . . . hurry now, and you'll receive a two week free membership . . . then it became a month. What finally got me was three free months. So I signed up, and after a week or so of browsing and filling that family tree, I eventually lost interest again. Forgot about it, until the three months was up and I got an email from Capital One, letting me know there was a charge on my card for a bit of money. I checked my statement, and realized that with the three free months of Ancestry membership, I had also signed up for a one year membership (15 months for the price of 12!).

So over the past few months, I've dawdled here and there, digging through census records and public trees and tracing back family as far as the 1600's in Massachusetts. But something strangely incredible happened a few weeks back. I recieved a message through Ancestry from a woman named Natalie, in Woodland, CA. Woodland is located directly north of Davis, CA, and to the northwest of Sacramento. I-5 runs through the center of town.

Natalie is a photographer in Woodland, and was looking through photos in an antique store when she stumbled upon a photo of a Wilbur Francis Peavler. She very kindly mailed me the photo, which I have posted to the right. There were two gentlemen by the name of Wilbur Francis Peavler: Senior (my great-grandfather) and Junior (grandfather). After a minor bit of investigation, I came to the conclusion that this is a photo of Senior. Lightly written in pencil on the back is his full name, the cost of the photo (which was $1), his age (4 months) and Aunt Belle.

Aunt Belle seems to be the mystery. I can find no record of either of his parents having a sibling named Belle, or Isabelle, or any other variation of Belle. This has opened up a new chapter in my search and I have been spending free time digging through the Ancestry website.

In other news, I finished Carrie. The book was much better than the movie, filling in the blanks of her mother's insanity and the overall death toll was much higher. 4 out of 5 stars is my rating, as much for its entertainment value as for the thoughts it conjured while I was reading it. Its a quick, demented read about a young girl snapping.

It's interesting to think about Carrie from a modern perspective. Keep in mind, this was Stephen King's first published novel, released in 1974. In our overcharged society where any instance of school bullying is met with severe punishment, when everyone is so sensitive to the idea of school shootings and teenagers snapping, I could not help but wonder if Carrie would ever see the light of day in today's publishing world. If a young struggling English teacher at a Maine high school tried to publish a book today about a young bullied girl snapping and killing everyone at her high school prom, would that teacher be praised as a "modern master of horror" or would he be suspended without pay pending a psychological analysis? The opening scenes deal with menstruation in a high school shower. That teachers would be accused of being a pervert and chased out of town on a rail.

Carrie is one of the most challenged books in America. On a list of 100 books which was compiled by the American Library Association of the books that have faced the most challenges since 1990, a list that includes works such as Catcher in the Rye, the Harry Potter series, and American Psycho (as well as Cujo, another Stephen King work that I will be touching on in tomorrow's edition), Carrie was ranked as the 77th most Challenged book. The ALA compiled this list of books as part of Banned Books Week, and the books are ranked by the number of official challenges each title has faced in regards to being removed from library shelves.

So I ask again, if Stephen King were a young, thirty-something English teacher today, in the year 2012, would he be able to publish a book like Carrie? I honestly do not think a book like Carrie would see the light of day today.

Sticking with my old friend Stephen King, I decided to pick up, and have since, completed reading 'salem's Lot, Stephen King's second published novel, and his ode to vampire classics of the past. This is a real vampire book, there are no glittery vampires, no "vegetarian" vampires, no vampires living amongst humans and having crazy vampire sex. It's blood and gore and stays true to vampire lore. Catholic priests fighting with holy water, men driving wooden stakes through hearts, Van Helsing references -- all that was once good about the vampire genre.

But I will save that until tomorrow, good friends.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Hello, Good Reader . . .

Over the weekend I finished Clash of Kings. It was pitched battles and political intrigue to the very end. I guess I should rate it. Isn’t that what people are supposed to do when writing about other creative wo


In the spirit of Netflix reviews and Yelp reviews, I will base my very highly touted opinion on a numbering system of 1 to 5.rks? Give them some sort of numeric value so that when people go through and read their reviews, they don’t have to waste their time reading the whole thing. There’s just a number they can reference.

5: Awesome, amazing, life changing read that I will read over and over again. Very few books will or have reached this pinnacle of perfection. Some past reads that have garnered 5 coveted stars from me include the Harry Potter series (all 7 books I have read or listened to on audiobook format numerous times), Devil in the White City by Erik Larson, The Big Oyster by Mark Kurlansky, and Under the Banner of Heaven by Jon K


4: Awesome, amazing, exciting reads that I probably won’t bother reading again, but loved nonetheless.rakauer. If you haven’t read any of them, I highly recommend each and everyone.

3: Entertaining, had its moments, but all in all just an average book

2: Really, I wasted my time on this?

1: Who in their right mind thought it was a good idea to print a piece of garbage like this.

There is will be no zero ratings, because there had to be some sort of redeeming value to the book that caught my attention enough to try and read it. If it was the cover that caught my eye, kudos to the designer. If the blurb on the back made it sound spectacular, kudos to the marketing department. If a friend recommended it, I need a new friend.

My first official grade for on this blog will be for Clash of Kings by George R. R. Martin, the second book in

the “Song of Ice and Fire” series. Drum roll please . . .


4!

It was great, highly entertaining, one of a kind yarn. But whether it has to do with the length of the book (1040 pages!) or the fact its part of a long on going series, I don’t see myself reading it again in the future.

The unfortunate drawback in my life at the moment is that all my books are currently in boxes in the garages. A few have made their way inside, mostly mass market paperbacks and others that I have bought in the past few months since the move out of San Francisco. Monday morning, I was perusing my small shelf next to the front door and grabbed a copy of Carrie. I have seen the movie; I know the story, as do most of you. But I have never read the book. As we all know, books are always better than the movies. What I have discovered lately is that sometimes I find that watching a movie before reading the book makes the experience better. I know, it sounds a bit weird, but bear with me.

I recently read The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo series. I saw the Swedish versions and recently saw the David Fincher version. I found myself slightly disappointed with each version, because I started picking out things that they left out. Pivotal plot points just gone.

On the flip side, I remember not reading any of the Harry Potter series until the seventh book was released. Only then did I sit down and read each and every book back to back. I had seen the movies and found that I loved the books because the limited world I was introduced to in the movies opened up and seemed to become this living, breathing world. For those who had read the Harry Potter books before the movies, they always seemed to have the same complaints – they left this or that out. How could they leave that character out? How are they going to explain that in the later movies if they don’t at least touch on it now?

So Monday morning, I embarked on Carrie. I am nearly done with it already. It’s a short quick read, and the scary creepiness you see in the movie is multiplied ten fold because you actually see Carrie’s thought processes as she reacts to multiple events, including the infamous shower scene that starts the books.

So that’s it for now .

Have a lovely evening, good reader. I’ll see you next time

Thursday, January 19, 2012

With the Smell of Burnt Apple Pie in the Air ...

... I begin anew. Yes, my attempt at apple pie (homemade, from scratch, including the crust) may or may not have been a success. Its still cooling as I write. But I overfilled the crust with apples, and all the fluid it released boiled out of the crust and onto the coils of the oven below.

At first, my home smelled of sweetness and cinnamon and yumminess, all the smells that would make Paula Deen proud. Then the sugar goodness began to seep out of holes in the crimped crust and drip down to the coils and the smell turned to burnt sugar - acrid smoke filled the kitchen when I retrieved the pie from doom.

Fingers crossed that it had enough time to bake through . . .

Since the first of the new year, I have been reading Clash of Kings by George R. R. Martin, the second of his "A Song of Ice of Fire" series. You may be more familiar with the name Game of Thrones series, thanks to HBO. For those of you that may have read the books, or enjoyed the show, you'll know what I mean when I tell you that the Imp is not only the best character in the books, but one of the best characters in literature. And those of you that know the stories know that you should not get to attached to characters, because inevitably something terrible will happen to your favorite.

It's a densely written and highly detailed drama and action filled yarn. Without giving too much away, suffice to say that many people have sex, many people are killed, and some magic and sorcery is thrown in for good measure. Its a unique story, a medieval fantasy in a far away land - one part Once and Future King and one part Lord of the Rings.

Right now, 1040 pages of dark magic, horrific bloodshed, political intrique, and lustful testosterone driven kings and paupers are occupying my nightstand tonight. With a little over 200 pages left to go, I can't wait to see how this second chapter ends. I am eagerly awaiting the second season of Game of Thrones.

As to the apple pie, the crust was a bit burnt . . . the oven is going to be miserable to clean . . . but the filling was an orgasm to my tastebuds!

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Let's Do This Again

About three years ago, I started a blog. I posted three blogs, and a grand total of 4 people read them. Well, now I am back at it again, only this time I am going to try and have a focus. Last time I tried this, I was all over the place. Writing about sports, politics . . . well, suffice to say, a little about a lot of stuff.
I'll still write a little about a lot, but it will be in context with a focus.

What is that focus going to be, you may be asking yourself. Let me explain. As an aspiring novelist, I was once told that in order to become good at something, you have to practice at it. In order to become a good novelist, you have to practice not only your writing, but you have to read as well. So this blog will be My Life, Through Books. Or, if you prefer, A Year in Books (though more than a year would be awesome, if people actually want to read this).

I know, I know, the written word is dead, books are dead -- why would you want jump into a medium that is no longer relevant? Well, quite to the contrary, I think more people are reading and writing now than ever before. They are just publishing their prose in different formats. And with the advent of the Kindle and the Nook, books are more accessible now than ever before.

The problem is not that people are reading and writing less -- the problem is how they are writing and how people are reading. In this technological age of Texties, where OMG and LOL and LMFAO have taken the place of phone conversations and face to face meetings, a new shorthand form of writing has arisen. What we are dealing with is a generation of youth who are growing up unable to write a proper sentence, but they can write HTML and binary code without thinking.

So my goal is a vain attempt to hone a skill, while writing about what I am reading. And I will be writing it all in complete, fluid sentences, with nary an LOL or OMIK here. (OMIK: Open Mouth, Insert Keyboard -- yes, I know. I just discovered that one today).

Some ground rules for myself in this adventure that I am about to undertake:

First - all books that I read will be in paper form. No electronic format for me. If its only available as an e-book, oh well. It must not have been very good to begin with.

Second - I am not ashamed to admit that I do, in fact, judge a book by its cover. This is an adventure in reading, not literary criticism. So if you're expecting me to read Dostoevsky and extol on the virtues of Existentialism, tough! I did not understand Existentialism in college, what makes you think I am going to understand it now?

The above statement does not mean that I won't read a classic here and there for pleasure. I have a couple of Steinbeck novels on my shelf calling out to me to read them at some point. There is also a copy of Anna Karenina that I always said I was going to read and never have. That might be an option at some point. You never know -- its an adventure.

Which leads me to my third, and most important rule for myself -- I am going to grab a book, and I am going to read it front cover to back cover and I will not pick up another book until that one is finished. And I will not make a list of books to read. When I finish with one, I will place it on my shelf, and browse until I find a new one. Whichever way the mood takes me is how I will conduct this adventure.

So sit back, relax, and I hope you enjoy taking this ride with me.